Can’t see the Woodlark for the trees? Commercial forests as a habitat for a bird of conservation concern

Abstract

This study investigated the extent to which intensive forest management practices influence a widespread bird of conservation concern, the Woodlark Lullula arborea. We compared trends of the studied population in Notec Forest, Poland during 2010–2014 against country-wide monitoring data, and populations of the forest interior versus forest edge dominated landscapes (forest-agricultural area mosaic). We also studied the influences of forest management practice (clearing size, stand structure, forestry activities on restock sites, harvesting in the neighboring habitat, and retaining tree aggregates) on the population of this species. Changes in woodlark numbers, habitat availability, and quality differences among studied sites and years were assessed using ANOVA. The influence of habitat characteristics on woodlark occupancy and abundances were tested by Generalized Estimation Equations, while the magnitude of influences in the study years was compared by Random Forest algorithm (as were population trends). Over the four study years, 419 woodlark pairs occupied 336 patches, with a maximum of 127 pairs. The number of woodlark pairs fell by 40% on the studied areas over the period, in line with declines across Poland as a whole. In our study system, population trends did not differ between forest and forest- agro mosaic landscapes. Size, age and number of available habitats did not differ either temporally or spatially during the study. Retention of unfelled trees in clearfell areas and forest works in the nearby sites, however, showed slight differences among the sampling polygons. Larger habitat patch size and restock areas under five years favored woodlarks. Less important but still significant positive influences were a higher proportion of retained trees and elongated shape of the habitat patches. Forestry activities on the neighbor stands were correlated with increased woodlark abundances, which is an unexpected result. Moreover, forestry provides suitable habitats for woodlarks in a dynamically changing arrangement. The magnitude of the studied factors’ influences on woodlarks showed a very high difference between study years, with the highest values in the years where woodlarks are the most numerous. In conclusion, we found no evidence that contemporary forestry adversely affects Woodlark habitat occupancy. Our study suggests that while managing land for one ecosystem service (timber), an apparent dis-benefit (loss of recreational attractiveness) might benefit some semi-open habitat species.