Abstract
We show that Sylvester's classical determinantal identity is equivalent to its generalizations given by the Mühlbach–Gasca–(López-Carmona)–Ramírez identity and the Beckermann–Mühlbach identity. We also show that the generating extension principles associated with each of these three identities (Muir's law of extensible minors, Mühlbach's extension principle and the extension principle given in Camargo, 2013 [3]) are equivalent and we use this fact to conclude that all these six statements (and also Jacobi's identity on the minors of the adjugate and Cayley's law of complementaries) are actually equivalent. These findings lead naturally to enquire whether there would exist a generalization of Sylvester's identity (or an extension principle) which could not be derived from Sylvester's identity itself.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.