Can Substituted Cyclopentadiene Become Aromatic or Antiaromatic?

Abstract

Cyclopentadiene derivatives with electronegative (F, Cl) or electropositive (H(3)Si, Me(3)Si) bis-5,5-substituents were studied at the B3LYP/6-311G* level of theory. It was found that there is no special stabilization or destabilization for any of the derivatives; the energetic effects that were previously attributed to aromatic stabilization or antiaromatic destabilization are the result of interactions in the reference systems. A nucleus-independent chemical shift (NICS) scan study at the HF-GIAO/6-311+G* theoretical level of these and similar derivatives suggest that they all show different magnitudes of diamagnetic ring current. None of the derivatives shows a paramagnetic ring current. Thus, cyclopentadienes are neither aromatic nor antiaromatic. It is also concluded that a diamagnetic ring current is perhaps necessary but certainly not a sufficient condition for aromaticity. The NICS scan procedure describes the type of ring current in the system, whereas a single isotropic NICS value (i.e., NICS(1)) may wrongly assign the type of ring current. It is shown that neither NICS(1) nor the NICS scan procedure can be used as a single aromaticity criterion.