Abstract

The perception of danger represents an essential ability of prey for gaining an informational advantage over their natural enemies. Especially in complex environments or at night, animals strongly rely on chemoreception to avoid predators. The ability to recognize danger by chemical cues and subsequent adaptive responses to predation threats should generally increase prey survival. Recent findings suggest that European catfish (Silurus glanis) introduction induce changes in fish community and we tested whether the direction of change can be attributed to differences in chemical cue perception. We tested behavioral response to chemical cues using three species of freshwater fish common in European water: rudd (Scardinius erythrophthalmus), roach (Rutilus rutilus), and perch (Perca fluviatilis). Further, we conducted a prey selectivity experiment to evaluate the prey preferences of the European catfish. Roach exhibited the strongest reaction to chemical cues, rudd decreased use of refuge and perch did not alter any behavior in the experiment. These findings suggest that chemical cue perception might be behind community data change and we encourage collecting more community data of tested prey species before and after European catfish introduction to test the hypothesis. We conclude that used prey species can be used as a model species to verify whether chemical cue perception enhances prey survival.

Highlights

  • We review large-­scale experiment data suggesting that European catfish might trigger change in prey fish community and encourage collecting more field evidence to verify the hypothesis that the direction of change is in accordance with behavioral response to chemical cues of tested prey species

  • The extent of species-­specific reactions to chemical cues is dependent on their anti-­predator strategy

  • CONFLICT OF INTERESTNone Declared. JP, CB, LV, and MŠ designed the study. MŠ, ZS, MČ, PB, LV, IV, MV, and MP performed experiments. PB, DR, and ATS performed statistical analysis. MŠ wrote the first draft. All authors contributed with substantial comments during manuscript preparation

Read more

Summary

| MATERIALS AND METHODS

Roach, and rudd are widespread in the European part of the Palearctic region and are common prey species of piscivores. Roach and rudd altered their behavior in the presence of chemical cues compared to the control treatment Roach increased their shoaling index (mean ± SD in control vs experiment, statistics: 2.1 ± 0.3 vs 2.4 ± 0.4, t(19) = −3.09, p = .009) and refuge use (1.4 ± 0.7 vs 1.9 ± 0.6, t(19) = −2.55, p = .03), while their activity (log10) remained unchanged (4.1 ± 0.9 vs 4.0 ± 1, t(19) = 0.32, p = .624). All behavioral parameters were significantly different among species in the control treatments: shoaling index (Kruskal–Wallis (K–W) χ2 = 19.438, df = 2, p < .001; rudd 2.52 ± 0.29 > roach 2.10 ± 0.32 > perch 1.98 ± 0.41), refuge use (K–W χ2 = 41.89, df = 2, p < .001; perch 2.89 ± 0.25 > roach 1.39 ± 0.66 > rudd 0.86 ± 0.35), and activity (K–W χ2 = 29.68, df = 2, p < .001, rudd 175 ± 55 > roach 86 ± 63 > perch 47 ± 43; Figure 1).

| DISCUSSION
Findings
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call