Abstract
Temporal attention can be entrained exogenously to rhythms. Indeed, faster and more accurate responses were previously found when the target appeared in-phase with a preceding rhythm in comparison to when it was out of phase. However, the nature of this rhythm-induced attentional effect is not well understood. To better understand the processes underlying rhythm-induced attention, we employed a continuous measure of perceived orientation and a mixture-model analysis. A trial in our study started with a sequence of auditory beeps separated by a fixed inter-beeps interval in the regular (rhythmic) condition or by variable inter-beeps intervals in the irregular condition. A visual target-a line embedded in a circle-followed the sequence. The 'critical' interval between the last beep and the target was chosen randomly from several possible Inter-Onset Intervals (IOIs), of which only one was in-phase with the rhythm. The target was followed by a probe line, and the participants were asked to rotate it to reproduce the target's orientation. The measure of performance for a given trial was the difference in degrees between the orientation of the target and that reproduced by the observer. We found that guessing rate was lower with regular than irregular rhythms. However, there was no effect of rhythm type (regular vs irregular) on the quality of representation (measured as the variability in reproducing the target). Furthermore, the rhythm effect was present only when rhythm type was fixed within a block, and it was found with all IOIs, not just the in-phase IOI. This lack of specificity suggests that these results reflect a general effect of rhythm on alertness.
Highlights
As with spatial attention, temporal attention can be endogenous or exogenous [e.g., 1; 2; 3; 4]
The experiment lasted for approximately 90 minutes and included 450 trials: 120 trials for each critical Inter-Onset Intervals (IOIs) + 90 (20%) catch trials in which no target was presented to minimize the ‘foreperiod’ effect–improved performance with longer critical IOIs [e.g., 7]. This effect is common when different critical IOIs are mixed within a block, and it is presumably due to the fact that expectancy builds up as time elapses [e.g., 30]
We extracted these parameters for each participant and analyzed them using a repeated-measures two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA)
Summary
Temporal attention can be endogenous or exogenous [e.g., 1; 2; 3; 4]. Analyzing the error data with the mixture model allowed us to test whether rhythm entrainment can affect the quality of the perceptual representation of the target (SD), the guessing rate (g), or both.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.