Can Perirectal Spacing Help Reduce GI Toxicity in Patients Undergoing Post-Prostatectomy Radiotherapy?

Abstract

<h3>Purpose/Objective(s)</h3> To report single institutional feasibility of recto-vesical hyaluronic acid or hydrogel spacer insertion for patients undergoing post prostatectomy radiotherapy (PPRT). <h3>Materials/Methods</h3> Spacer insertion was considered in patients referred for PPRT following an intra or interfascial radical prostatectomy who had no radiological evidence of local recurrence (based on prostate specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography). The spacer was inserted into the perirectal fat between the bladder and anterior rectal wall using a transperineal approach under transrectal ultrasound guidance. Two gold seed fiducial markers were also inserted at the level of the vesico-urethral anastomosis for image guided radiation therapy as per institutional practice. Pre and post spacer computerized tomography planning scans, together with post spacer magnetic resonance imaging scans, were acquired for dosimetric comparison. The prostate bed clinical target volume (CTV) was delineated according to Australian guidelines and the CTV was uniformly expanded by 7mm to create the planning target volume (PTV). The prescribed dose to the prostate bed was 70.2Gy in 1.8 Gy fractions using volumetric arc radiation therapy. The PTV and rectal dosimetry for the two sets of planning scans (PTV 7mm/pre spacer and PTV 7mm/post spacer) were compared. <h3>Results</h3> Sixty-one patients were recruited between 9/18 to 10/21. Fifty-eight patients successfully underwent rectal spacer insertion without postoperative complications. We did not attempt spacer insertion in 3 patients as we were unable to hydrodissect the perirectal fat plane. Only 33 patients had pre spacer planning scans available for dosimetric comparison. The distance between the bladder and rectal wall was increased from ≤1mm to a median of 11mm (9-13) at its greatest extent. The rectal volume for all patients (N=61) receiving 42.2Gy (rV60%), 49.1Gy (rV70%), 56.2 Gy (rV80%), 63.2Gy (rV90%) and 70.2Gy (rV100%)] were 28.1%, 23%, 17.9%, 12.5% and 3.8% respectively. With spacing, a statistically significant reduction was seen on all rectal volume end points from rV60% to rV100% in the 33 patients with both pre and post planning scans (see Table 1). The median follow up was 10.5 months (3-31). The risk of any grade acute GI toxicity was 28% (grade 1 26% and grade 2 2%). The risk of late GI toxicity was 7% (all grade 1 proctitis). <h3>Conclusion</h3> More than 90% of our selected PPRT patients were able to achieve recto-vesical separation, with no surgical complications, resulting in a 43.7% reduction in rV90%. The reduction in acute and late grade 2 GI toxicity is of notable significance, albeit with short follow up. Table 1 Pre and Post Spacer Rectal Dosimetry