Abstract

The ultra-high risk (UHR) state was originally conceived to identify individuals at imminent risk of developing psychosis. Although recent studies have suggested that most individuals designated UHR do not, they constitute a distinctive group, exhibiting cognitive and functional impairments alongside multiple psychiatric morbidities. UHR characterization using molecular markers may improve understanding, provide novel insight into pathophysiology, and perhaps improve psychosis prediction reliability. Whole-blood gene expressions from 56 UHR subjects and 28 healthy controls are checked for existence of a consistent gene expression profile (signature) underlying UHR, across a variety of normalization and heterogeneity-removal techniques, including simple log-conversion, quantile normalization, gene fuzzy scoring (GFS), and surrogate variable analysis. During functional analysis, consistent and reproducible identification of important genes depends largely on how data are normalized. Normalization techniques that address sample heterogeneity are superior. The best performer, the unsupervised GFS, produced a strong and concise 12-gene signature, enriched for psychosis-associated genes. Importantly, when applied on random subsets of data, classifiers built with GFS are “meaningful” in the sense that the classifier models built using genes selected after other forms of normalization do not outperform random ones, but GFS-derived classifiers do. Data normalization can present highly disparate interpretations on biological data. Comparative analysis has shown that GFS is efficient at preserving signals while eliminating noise. Using this, we demonstrate confidently that the UHR designation is well correlated with a distinct blood-based gene signature.

Highlights

  • Prodromal intervention has reportedly beneficial effects in attenuating, delaying, and even preventing psychosis onset (McGlashan et al, 2003; McGorry et al, 2002; Morrison et al, 2004)

  • ultra-high risk (UHR) designation is useful: Approximately 10%–50% of positively identified individuals convert to psychosis within a year (Haroun, Dunn, Haroun, & Cadenhead, 2006; Lencz, Smith, Auther, Correll, & Cornblatt, 2003; Mason et al, 2004; Yung et al, 2006)

  • Probe-to-gene name mapping, and following median centering of expression, four normalization approaches are applied on the quantified data: Logconversion (None), quantile normalization (Quantile), gene fuzzy scoring (GFS; Belorkar & Wong, 2016), and surrogate variable analysis (SVA; Leek & Storey, 2007)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Prodromal (early) intervention has reportedly beneficial effects in attenuating, delaying, and even preventing psychosis onset (McGlashan et al, 2003; McGorry et al, 2002; Morrison et al, 2004). Positive identification of ultra-high-risk (UHR) individuals is achieved via interview-based tests: the Comprehensive Assessment of at Risk Mental State (CAARMS; Yung et al, 2002) and the Structured Interview of Prodromal Syndrome (McGlashan, Miller, & Woods, 2001). Both assess risk via a panel of scored clinical traits, including the intensity, frequency, and duration of psychosis symptoms and risk factors (e.g., family history). Prodromal detection requires improvement, and we must leverage objective data to reveal pathophysiology and perform risk assessment

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call