Can Neoclassical Realism Become a Genuine Theory of International Relations?Squandered Opportunity: Neoclassical Realism and Iranian Foreign Policy. By Thomas Juneau. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2015.EU and NATO Relations with Russia: After the Collapse of the Soviet Union. By Glenn Diesen. Abingdon: Routledge, 2016.Neoclassical Realist Theory of International Politics. By Norrin M. Ripsman, Jeffrey W. Taliaferro, and Steven E. Lobell.

Abstract

Previous articleNext article No AccessReview EssayCan Neoclassical Realism Become a Genuine Theory of International Relations? Squandered Opportunity: Neoclassical Realism and Iranian Foreign Policy. By Thomas Juneau. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2015. EU and NATO Relations with Russia: After the Collapse of the Soviet Union. By Glenn Diesen. Abingdon: Routledge, 2016. Neoclassical Realist Theory of International Politics. By Norrin M. Ripsman, Jeffrey W. Taliaferro, and Steven E. Lobell. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.Nicholas Ross SmithNicholas Ross SmithUniversity of Nottingham, Ningbo China Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUSFull Text Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by The Journal of Politics Volume 80, Number 2April 2018 Sponsored by the Southern Political Science Association Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/696882 Views: 2923Total views on this site Citations: 11Citations are reported from Crossref HistoryPublished online February 27, 2018 © 2018 by the Southern Political Science Association. All rights reserved.PDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Nicholas Ross Smith, Grant Dawson Mearsheimer, Realism, and the Ukraine War, Analyse & Kritik 44, no.22 (Aug 2022): 175–200.https://doi.org/10.1515/auk-2022-2023Lenore Martin Constructing a realistic explanation of Turkish – US relations, Turkish Studies 23, no.55 (May 2022): 765–783.https://doi.org/10.1080/14683849.2022.2077102Carly E Beckerman Is there a cyber security dilemma?, Journal of Cybersecurity 8, no.11 (Sep 2022).https://doi.org/10.1093/cybsec/tyac012Mark R Brawley Britain's Trade Liberalization in the 1840s: A Defensive Neoclassical Realist Explanation, Foreign Policy Analysis 18, no.44 (Sep 2022).https://doi.org/10.1093/fpa/orac019Stephen P. Westcott Causes of Interstate Border Dispute Intractability: A Neoclassical Realist Levels of Analysis Approach, (Feb 2022): 75–108.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-7450-1_3Grant Dawson Classical Realism, Status, and Emotions: Understanding the Canada/Saudi Arabia Dispute and Its Implications for Global Politics, Global Studies Quarterly 1, no.44 (Oct 2021).https://doi.org/10.1093/isagsq/ksab027Elias Götz Neoclassical Realist Theories, Intervening Variables, and Paradigmatic Boundaries, Foreign Policy Analysis 17, no.22 (Feb 2021).https://doi.org/10.1093/fpa/oraa026Mehmet ŞAHİN Uluslararası Ekonomi Politikte Neoklasik Realizme Duyulan İhtiyaç: Avrasya Ekonomi Topluluğu, Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi , no.5757 (Dec 2020): 253–272.https://doi.org/10.18070/erciyesiibd.745808Michiel Foulon, Gustav Meibauer Realist avenues to global International Relations, European Journal of International Relations 26, no.44 (Jun 2020): 1203–1229.https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066120926706Nicholas Ross Smith A Four-Dimensional Neoclassical Realist Framework, (Jun 2019): 9–23.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20675-8_2Gustav Meibauer Interests, ideas, and the study of state behaviour in neoclassical realism, Review of International Studies 46, no.11 (Aug 2019): 20–36.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210519000214