Abstract

In order for the maritime sector to align itself with the targets set by the Paris Agreement, it should reduce its GHG emissions by at least 50% by 2050 compared to 2008 with the ultimate aim to phase them out entirely. It is along these lines that in April 2018 the International Maritime Organisation (IMO) developed a strategy, consisting of a range of potential technical and operational measures to reduce GHG emissions from international shipping, ranking from improvements on ship design to the employment of alternative fuels. In order to stimulate the adoption of these policies, the IMO also considers the implementation of market-based measures (MBM) that will provide additional incentives to shipowners to invest in new technologies and uptake of cleaner fuels. The MBMs analysed in this paper include two different policies proposed by different countries and associations for the abatement of GHG emissions from shipping: a) the International Fund for GHG emissions from ships that includes the imposition of a global levy on marine bunker fuel for all vessels and b) the Maritime Emission Trading System (METS) that requires all maritime companies to buy/sell emission allowances to meet their annual emission reductions targets, setting a cap on global shipping emissions. This paper presents and analyses these two diverse MBMs, highlighting their main advantages and drawbacks. The scope of this paper is to investigate the potential of these MBMs to incentivise investments in new technologies and alternative fuels, both essential for the decarbonisation of the maritime sector.

Highlights

  • The environmental and energy efficiency performance of shipping is better than any other mode of freight transport, accounting for 2.2 % of total global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (Smith et al, 2014)

  • The scope of this paper is to investigate the potential of these market-based measures (MBM) to incentivise investments in new technologies and alternative fuels, both essential for the decarbonisation of the maritime sector

  • It is along these lines that in April 2018 the International Maritime Organisation (IMO) developed a strategy, consisting of a range of potential technical and operational measures to reduce GHG emissions from international shipping, ranking from improvements on ship design to the employment of alternative fuels (IMO, 2018)

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

The environmental and energy efficiency performance of shipping is better than any other mode of freight transport, accounting for 2.2 % of total global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (Smith et al, 2014). In order for the maritime sector to align itself with the targets set by the Paris Agreement, it should reduce its GHG emissions by at least 50 % by 2050 compared to 2008 with the ultimate aim to phase them out entirely It is along these lines that in April 2018 the International Maritime Organisation (IMO) developed a strategy, consisting of a range of potential technical and operational measures to reduce GHG emissions from international shipping, ranking from improvements on ship design to the employment of alternative fuels (IMO, 2018). Evidence and literature clearly suggest that the implementation of technical or operational measures alone could not result in sufficient emissions reductions, given the expected growth of shipping, but innovative solutions and combinations need to be developed (Shi, 2016; Bouman et al, 2017; Christodoulou and Woxenius, 2019).

METHODOLOGY
PRESENTATION OF THE MBMs
A GLOBAL LEVY SCHEME ON MARINE BUNKER FUEL
ADVANTAGES – DISADVANTAGES OF THE DIFFERENT MBMs
Findings
CONCLUSIONS
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call