Abstract

The difference in the GDP levels is crucial for the macroeconomic forecasting to develop adequate and supportive fiscal and monetary policies. Most mismeasurements under current geoeconomics challenges can be explained by the difficulty in predicting recessions and the overestimation of the economy’s potential capacity. The research aims to consider the GDP gap’s effectiveness for the possible forecasting of the monetary policy, particularly the central bank’s interest rate. The study uses quantitative methods, particularly VAR modeling. The VAR model is chosen as a proven useful tool for describing the dynamic behavior of economic time series and forecasting. The data sample is chosen as Eurozone, the United States, and Japan. The similarity is detected on output gaps implementation in the considered states; however, the variety in the responses to the financial crisis is revealed. This difference is due to the different sensitivity of economies on the impact of monetary instruments. In particular, the Japanese economy has a relatively low level of sensitivity to changes in monetary instruments. In terms of the reactions of central banks to the current economic crisis caused by COVID-19, then due to the global lockdown and the incredible decline in economic activity, almost all countries are in a situation of negative GDP gap according the paper’s approach. However, the measures to mitigate it will vary in different states. AcknowledgmentThe paper is done in the framework of scientific faculty research 16КF040-04 “Steady-state security assessment: a new framework for analysis” (2016–2021), Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv (Ukraine).

Highlights

  • The contemporary economic theory considers governments and central banks’ ability to regulate economic growth

  • This paper examines the impact of monetary instruments, the key rate of central banks on the size of the GDP gap

  • The GDP gap is considered the deviation from the level of potential GDP, which is determined by the long-term GDP trend

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

The contemporary economic theory considers governments and central banks’ ability to regulate economic growth. The use of fiscal and monetary instruments allows stimulating or discouraging economic activity This shifts the equilibrium point towards the potential output level. The response of the leading central banks and governments of almost all countries in 2020 was almost synchronous: a significant weakening of monetary policy and the introduction of fiscal incentives for the economy. This response only leads to an increase in government debt and the devaluation of currencies’ purchasing power, but does not address the global attempt to reach sustainable economic development. This paper focuses on only one of the tools – monetary tools (key interest rates which are currently the main instrument of inflation-targeting central banks’ monetary policy) to stimulate the economy due to the GDP gap

LITERATURE REVIEW
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
Findings
CONCLUSION
C R-squared
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call