Abstract

The aim of the current study is to provide an empirical test of containment theory of Walter Reckless (1899–1988). The theory proposes that outer and inner containment hold adolescents back from delinquency even when external factors pull and push them toward it. This early control theory was ahead of its time, but never received the empirical attention it deserves. This article outlines the core theoretical concepts and the basic propositions in order to empirically examine their validity. We employed hybrid linear regression analysis using longitudinal survey data of 612 adolescents (12–18 years old) in the city of The Hague, the Netherlands. The results indicate that outer and inner containment can be meaningfully distinguished, and that several but not all propositions of the theory are supported. Inner and outer containment function as a buffer against external pulls and are able to counteract the effect of increases in environmental pulls during adolescence. We conclude that containment theory is still a promising interaction theory that can help us understand why adolescents who experience external pulls toward delinquency are able to resist these influences.

Highlights

  • Criminology has a long tradition of formulating theories about the causes of delinquent behaviour, going back to the early 19th century (Bruinsma, 2014; Burkhead, 2006; Jones, 1986)

  • In addition, we investigate the extent to which inner and outer containment buffer the effect of increases in environmental pulls over time on increases in delinquency

  • In the first step we constructed subscales that were measured by the items, and in the second step we constructed inner and outer containment measured by these subscales

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Criminology has a long tradition of formulating theories about the causes of delinquent behaviour, going back to the early 19th century (Bruinsma, 2014; Burkhead, 2006; Jones, 1986). These theories have ‘careers’, just like the careers of scholars, offenders and rock stars (Dooley, 2010). Theories get dismissed or ignored for non-scientific reasons – because they do not fit into the zeitgeist anymore, or because other, similar but better sold theories take over

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call