Abstract

This study evaluated the effectiveness of combined dietary and enrichment strategies to manage tail biting in pigs with intact tails in a conventional fully-slatted floor housing system. A 2 × 2 × 2 factorial design was used. Pigs had either a high fibre (weaner 5.3% and finisher 11.6% of crude fibre) or standard fibre diet (weaner 3.7% and finisher 5.9% of crude fibre). In the weaner stage, pigs had either a spruce wooden post (supplied in a wall-mounted dispenser) or a rubber floor toy as a enrichment device, and in the finisher stage, they had either the same or alternate enrichment item. Six hundred and seventy-two pigs were assigned to 48 pens of 14 pigs and followed from weaning until slaughter. Individual tail lesion scores and pen level behaviours were directly recorded every 2 weeks. Twenty-six pens had tail biting outbreaks and 161 injured pigs needed removal for treatment. Pigs fed with the high fibre diet performed more tail biting (p < 0.05) and tended to have a worse tail damage scores than those fed the standard fibre diet (p = 0.08). Pigs which had the floor toy as weaners and wood as finishers tended to have fewer tail lesions in the finisher stage than their counterparts (p = 0.06). Pigs receiving the floor toy as enrichment interacted with the enrichment more frequently overall (p < 0.001) and performed fewer harmful behaviours in the weaner stage (p < 0.05). Overall, higher fibre in the diet in a relatively barren environment did not help reduce tail biting or tail lesions. Altering the fibre level in the pigs' diet and providing a single enrichment device to undocked pigs on fully slatted floors resulted in a high level of tail biting and a large proportion of pigs with partial tail amputation.

Highlights

  • EU Commission Directive 2001/93/EC [1] lays down minimum standards for pig welfare, stating that tail docking is banned as a routine practice to control tail biting

  • We have shown that when either a spruce post or a rubber floor toy was provided as a single enrichment item in a pen of seven tail docked finishing pigs, they attracted a similar level of interactions from pigs [14]

  • This study compared the effectiveness of two point-source environmental enrichment items, combined with a standard or high fibre diet in preventing tail biting behaviour and tail lesions in undocked pigs kept on fully-slatted floors

Read more

Summary

Introduction

EU Commission Directive 2001/93/EC [1] lays down minimum standards for pig welfare, stating that tail docking is banned as a routine practice to control tail biting. According to a recent survey, among all EU countries approximately 77% of pigs are still tail docked [2]. Dietary fibre and enrichment effects on tail biting in undocked pigs

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call