Can higher training practice dosage with treadmill slip-perturbation necessarily reduce risk of falls following overground slip?

Abstract

BackgroundPerturbation training is an emerging paradigm to reduce idiopathic falls (without clinical signs or symptoms) in older adults. While a higher threat dosage (intensity) in motor learning often directly relates to greater adaptation, retention, and generalization, little is known whether increasing the practice dosage (repetition) of slip-perturbation training would necessarily improve its outcomes. Research questionCan higher practice dosage of treadmill slip-perturbation training lead to greater generalization to an overground slip immediately after the training? MethodsForty-five community-dwelling older adults (73.5 ± 5.6 years old) participated in the present study. They were conveniently assigned to three groups with equivalent treadmill walking duration: treadmill slip-perturbation training group with 40 practice dosage, 24 practice dosage, and zero practice dosage (without slip-perturbation). Later on during overground walking, all of them were exposed to the same generalization test (a novel slip on a walkway). Their recovery outcomes (fall, or no fall; balance loss, or no balance loss) and center of mass stability were compared. ResultsHigher practice dosage did not show significantly less incidence of fall, balance loss, or greater stability in comparison to lower practice dosage (p > .05). The present study showed that there was no evidence of dose-response relationship when the practice dosage was set above the 24 trials of practice dosage in treadmill slip-perturbation training. SignificanceContrary to our hypothesis, increased practice dosage (40-slips) in treadmill slip-perturbation training from the commonly used threshold (24-slips) did not necessarily benefit immediate generalization from treadmill to overground walking among community-dwelling older adults.