Abstract
High resolution topographic surveys such as those provided by Structure-from-Motion (SfM) contain a wealth of information that is not always exploited in the generation of Digital Elevation Models (DEMs). In particular, several authors have related sub-metre scale topographic variability (or ‘surface roughness’) to sediment grain size by deriving empirical relationships between the two. In fluvial applications, such relationships permit rapid analysis of the spatial distribution of grain size over entire river reaches, providing improved data to drive three-dimensional hydraulic models, allowing rapid geomorphic monitoring of sub-reach river restoration projects, and enabling more robust characterisation of riverbed habitats. However, comparison of previously published roughness-grain-size relationships shows substantial variability between field sites. Using a combination of over 300 laboratory and field-based SfM surveys, we demonstrate the influence of inherent survey error, irregularity of natural gravels, particle shape, grain packing structure, sorting, and form roughness on roughness-grain-size relationships. Roughness analysis from SfM datasets can accurately predict the diameter of smooth hemispheres, though natural, irregular gravels result in a higher roughness value for a given diameter and different grain shapes yield different relationships. A suite of empirical relationships is presented as a decision tree which improves predictions of grain size. By accounting for differences in patch facies, large improvements in D50 prediction are possible. SfM is capable of providing accurate grain size estimates, although further refinement is needed for poorly sorted gravel patches, for which c-axis percentiles are better predicted than b-axis percentiles.
Highlights
The interaction of river channel morphology and hydraulics at the sediment-water interface influences both water and sediment fluxes through fluvial systems as well as in-stream ecological processes by providing habitat (Rice et al, 2010)
The aim of this study is to advance the use of using surface roughness as a proxy for grain size in high resolution topographic surveys by disentangling the confounding effects of survey error, particle shape, sorting, grain packing structure, and bedforms on empirical relationships
Extracting grain size data from surface roughness metrics is increasingly popular in geomorphology as high resolution survey techniques have become more readily available
Summary
The interaction of river channel morphology and hydraulics at the sediment-water interface influences both water and sediment fluxes through fluvial systems as well as in-stream ecological processes by providing habitat (Rice et al, 2010). Bed material size represents one of the smallest scales of topographic variability within river channels. Analyses of grain size variability can yield information on flow history, sediment origins and patterns of previous transport and deposition (e.g., Folk and Ward, 1957; Friedman, 1979; Bui et al, 1989). Information on bed material size is essential for hydraulic modelling (Smart et al, 2004) and is required to predict boundary shear stress and sediment transport (e.g., Wilcock and Crowe, 2003) in morphodynamic models (e.g., Langendoen et al, 2016). Bed material size is an influential determinant of the availability of suitable spawning habitat for fish and habitat for macroinvertebrates (Armstrong et al, 2003; Fryirs, 2015)
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
