Abstract

AbstractEradicating invasive species is difficult, but success is more likely when populations are small after arrival. The cane toad, Rhinella marina, is an invasive pest species that threatens native fauna worldwide. Increasingly, environmental DNA (eDNA) is used as a technique to monitor the presence of invasive species given its power to detect low numbers of individuals. We aimed to investigate eDNA persistence in freshwater at three different temperatures (25, 30 and 35°C) and eDNA detection thresholds for R. marina using controlled experiments in aquaria. For the latter, two water volumes and two cane toad exposure times were used (800 or 200 L volume with 5 or 30 min exposure). A 15‐ml water sample was collected from each replicated aquaria and preserved with 5 ml Longmire's buffer. Environmental DNA was extracted and four technical quantitative PCR replicates were analyzed targeting the cane toad 16S rDNA mitochondrial gene. Environmental DNA decayed rapidly in water and was reliably detected for up to 3 days after cane toad removal, regardless of the temperature treatment. Also, cane toad eDNA was detected in the water after a 5‐min initial exposure of a single individual in 800 L of water. Under the physical parameters tested here, a positive detection means that a cane toad has been in contact with the water body between 1 and 3 days prior to the sampling event. The results of the present study show the importance of eDNA for determining the presence of a species that occurs at low abundance in a small water body, such as at the onset of a cane toad invasion.

Highlights

  • Invasive species constitute one of the major threats to native biodiversity worldwide

  • There are some areas in mainland Australia, such as in the Kimberley and Pilbara (Western Australia), as well as off-shore islands, that remain free from cane toads (Tingley et al, 2017)

  • We demonstrated that cane toad environmental DNA (eDNA) decays rapidly, it does so at the same rate across three different water temperatures and can still be detected up to 7 days after cane toads were last present, detections are more reliably obtained within 2–3 days of their most recent presence

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Invasive species constitute one of the major threats to native biodiversity worldwide. Cane toads are native to South and Central America (Zug & Zug, 1979) and were deliberately introduced into Queensland, Australia, in 1935 to act as a biological control agent against cane beetles in sugar plantations (Sabath, Boughton, & Easteal, 1981) Their ability to adapt to new environments due to their wide temperature tolerance range, (Zug & Zug, 1979) and low predation on them due to their high toxicity, has enabled this species to steadily spread into most of northern Australia (Tingley et al, 2017). Northern Australia faces some challenges that limit financial and human resources for regular cane toad monitoring using traditional methods: is remote, has poor accessibility, and has a sparse human population

Objectives
Findings
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call