Abstract
Identification of alternatives to manual chart review might improve efficiency in quality improvement work. This study at a large community teaching hospital in central New Jersey considered whether selected charges from a patient-level costs database could identify compliance with Sixth Scope of Work indicators in congestive heart failure (CHF). Charges resulting from specific tests, from test outcomes, and from prescribed treatments were identified from among 75 randomly chosen patients with CHF. In the sample 65% (as determined by database analysis) and 69% (as determined by chart review) complied with the principal peer review organization criterion. This difference was less than that found between review and re-review of study charts.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Journal for healthcare quality : official publication of the National Association for Healthcare Quality
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
