Abstract

Recent research has shown that event-related brain potentials (ERPs) recorded while participants view lists of different consumer goods can be modulated by their preferences toward these products. However, it remains largely unknown whether ERP activity specific to a single consumer item can be informative about whether or not this item will be preferred in a shopping context. In this study, we examined whether single-item ERPs could reliably predict consumer preferences toward specific consumer goods. We recorded scalp EEG from 40 participants while they were viewing pictures of consumer goods and we subsequently asked them to indicate their preferences for each of these items. Replicating previous results, we found that ERP activity averaged over the six most preferred products was significantly differentiated from ERP activity averaged across the six least preferred products for three ERP components: The N200, the late positive potential (LPP) and positive slow waves (PSW). We also found that using single-item ERPs to infer behavioral preferences about specific consumer goods led to an overall predictive accuracy of 71%, although this figure varied according to which ERPs were targeted. Later positivities such as the LPP and PSW yielded relatively higher predictive accuracy rates than the frontal N200. Our results suggest that ERPs related to single consumer items can be relatively accurate predictors of behavioral preferences depending on which type of ERP effects are chosen by the researcher, and ultimately on the level of prediction errors that users choose to tolerate.

Highlights

  • There has been in recent years a growing interest in the integration of cognitive neuroscience methods with consumer behavior (CB) research

  • We wanted to examine whether SI-event-related brain potentials (ERPs) activity for three specific brain potentials (N200, late positive potential (LPP), and positive slow waves (PSW)) could discriminate between items that have different levels of known behavioral preferences

  • We successfully replicated Goto et al.’s (2017) results, as grouprelated activity for the N200, LPP and PSW were significantly modulated by levels of behavioral preference

Read more

Summary

Introduction

There has been in recent years a growing interest in the integration of cognitive neuroscience methods with consumer behavior (CB) research This trend has led to the development of a discipline often termed “Neuromarketing” or “Consumer Neuroscience” (Ariely and Berns, 2010; Javor et al, 2013; Plassmann et al, 2015; Hakim and Levy, 2018). This new field of knowledge has often been linked to a number of controversial claims, such as the contention that brain activity measured while consumers view a product could be used to infer attitudes and intentions toward it, or the purported existence of a “buy button” in the brain (Ariely and Berns, 2010). EEG/ERP methods have been widely used by private Neuromarketing consultancy companies (Morin, 2011; Boksem and Smidts, 2015; Stanton et al, 2017; Hakim and Levy, 2018)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call