Can Binocular Alignment Distinguish Hypertropia in Sagging Eye Syndrome From Superior Oblique Palsy?

Abstract

PurposeAlthough the three-step test (3ST) is typically used to diagnose superior oblique palsy (SOP), sagging eye syndrome (SES) has clinical similarities. We sought to determine if alignment measurements can distinguish unilateral SOP from hypertropia in SES.MethodsWe studied hypertropic subjects who underwent surface-coil magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) demonstrating either SO cross-section reduction indicative of congenital or acquired palsy (SOP group) or lateral rectus muscle sag (SES group). Alignment was measured by Hess screen and prism-cover testing. Multiple supervised machine learning methods were employed to evaluate diagnostic accuracy. Rectus pulley coordinates were determined in SES cases fulfilling the 3ST.ResultsTwenty-three subjects had unilateral SOP manifested by SO atrophy. Eighteen others had normal SO size but MRI findings of SES. Maximum cross-section of the palsied SO was much smaller than contralaterally and in SES (P < 2 × 10−5). Inferior oblique cross-sections were similar in SOP and SES. In both SOP and SES, hypertropia increased in contralateral and decreased in ipsilateral gaze and was greater in ipsilateral than contralateral head tilt. In SES, nine subjects (50%) fulfilled the 3ST and had greater infraplacement of the lateral than medial rectus pulleys in the hypotropic orbit. Supervised machine learning of alignment data distinguished the diagnoses with areas under the receiver operating curves up to 0.93, representing excellent yet imperfect differential diagnosis.ConclusionsBecause the 3ST is often positive in SES, clinical alignment patterns may confound SES with unilateral SOP, particularly acquired SOP. Machine learning substantially but imperfectly improves classification accuracy.