Abstract

Objectives Surgery for varicose veins is still the method of choice worldwide. When varicose veins require bilateral surgery, a single procedure often is the preferred choice by the patient. Today, unilateral varicose vein surgery is frequently performed as an outpatient procedure, while in many institutions bilateral surgery is done as an in-hospital procedure. Design Retrospective comparative study. Methods Between 1 October 2004 and 31 October 2006, 433 patients underwent surgery for the great saphenous vein as in-patient procedure (303 unilateral and 130 bilateral), period 1. From 1 November 2006 until 31 December 2009, 825 patients had ambulatory great saphenous vein surgery (550 unilateral and 275 bilateral), period 2. We have compared unilateral and bilateral varicose vein surgery (high ligation and stripping of the great saphenous vein) and in-hospital procedures with ambulatory surgery, with regard to postoperative complications, postoperative pain and midterm follow-up. Results Operation time and total length of stay in the institution following varicose vein surgery were significantly shorter for period 2 compared with period 1 for both unilateral and bilateral surgery, without other differences between the groups. There were few postoperative complications without differences between periods, and between unilateral and bilateral surgery (wound infection 0.5%, haematoma requiring drainage 0.2%, transient paraesthesia 1.1%, superficial localised thrombophlebitis 0.6% and deep vein thrombosis in one unilaterally operated case only). Conclusions Bilateral varicose vein surgery can be safely performed as an outpatient procedure, without increased risk of postoperative complications, increased postoperative discomfort or midterm adverse effects compared with unilateral surgery.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call