Abstract

BackgroundPrevious studies mainly reported perpendicular and medial inclination insertion methods for C1 transpedicular screw insertion (TSI). Our recent study showed the ideal C1 transpedicular screw trajectory (TST) can be achieved by medial inclination, perpendicular or even lateral inclination insertion, and Axis C can be a reliable trajectory. The purpose of this study is to confirm Axis C is an ideal C1 TST by comparing the cortical perforation differences between actual C1 TSI and virtual C1 transpedicular screw insertion along Axis C (Virtual C1 Axis C TSI). MethodsFirstly, the cortical perforations of the transverse foramen and vertebral canal caused by C1 TSIs in twelve randomly selected patients were evaluated based on their postoperative CT data. Secondly, Virtual C1 Axis C TSIs were performed based on same patients’ preoperative CT data. Thirdly, the cortical perforation differences between actual and virtual screws were compared. ResultsIn actual C1 TSI group, there were thirteen locations of cortical perforation in the axial plane, with five sides in transverse foramen and eight sides in vertebral canal, the cortical perforation rate was 54.2%; the degree of perforation was mild in twelve locations and medium in one location. In contrast, there was no cortical perforation in Virtual C1 Axis C TSI group. ConclusionsAxis C is an ideal trajectory for C1 TSI, it can be utilized as a navigation route for computer assisted surgery system.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call