Abstract
Do arbitrators have authority to undertake independent legal research without authorization by the parties? Or, are they prohibited from doing so, as many arbitrators believe? These are vexing questions. For answers, this article looks for guidance in the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA), state arbitration statutes, case law, and the rules of several arbitration institutions, as well as the Code of Ethics for Arbitrators in Commercial Disputes. The takeaway is that if an arbitrator wants an award that will withstand an attack based on evident partiality, misconduct or the exceeding of powers, there are good reasons to refrain from unauthorized legal research. This may seem counter intuitive. Arbitration is a creature of contract and the implications that flow from that conclusion heavily impact the answers to the questions being proposed.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
