Abstract
The exchanges and chemical reactions of CO2 within the blood are not complete during its transit time through the alveolar capillaries, so that theoretically alveolar PCO2 cannot exactly equal end-capillary blood PCO2. However, as a practical matter, the technical errors in determining alveolar and peripheral arterial PCO2 are so large in comparison with the difference between pulmonary arterial PCO2 and pulmonary venous PCO2, owing to the large effective solubility of CO2 in blood, that for this reason alone any difference between alveolar and end-capillary PCO2 can be neglected. The hypothetical mechanism that was originally proposed by Gurtner, Song, and Farhi for the production of an alveolar PCO2 greater than end-capillary PCO2 during rebreathing and depends on the existence of a radial gradient of H+ X HCO3- in the capillary blood near the wall appears unlikely because a) it would require a significant separation of charged ions over a large proportion of the capillary length and for a large proportion of the blood transit time and b) it would require a large radial gradient of PCO2 within the blood which on thermodynamic grounds would in turn require an unreasonable amount of energy to maintain.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Journal of applied physiology: respiratory, environmental and exercise physiology
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.