Abstract

Reflexivity is crucial for non-Aboriginal researchers working with Aboriginal people. This article describes a process of 'reflexive practice' undertaken by a white clinician/researcher while working with Aboriginal people. The clinician/researcher elicited Aboriginal people's experience of being haemodialysis recipients in rural Australia and their perceptions of their disease and treatment. The aim of this article is to report the methods used during this qualitative project to guide the researcher in conducting culturally appropriate health research with Aboriginal people. The goal of this work was to improve health services, informed and guided by the Aboriginal recipients themselves. The article describes the theory and methods used to develop reflexive skills. It also reports how the clinician/researcher managed her closeness to the topic and participants (some being patients under her care) and the processes used to ensure her subjectivity did not interfere with the quality of research. Three layers of reflexive practice are described: examining self within the research, examining interpersonal relationships with participants, and examining health systems. The alignment of the three 'lenses' used to describe the study is exposed. Complex insider/outsider roles are explored through multiple layers of reflexive practice. Regular journal writing was the primary tool used to undertake this reflexive practice. An Aboriginal advisory group and co-investigators collaborated and assisted the clinician/researcher to scrutinise and understand her positioning within the study. Researcher positioning, power and unequal relationships are discussed. Issues such as victim blaming and the disconnect between clinicians' views about treatment compliance and Aboriginal peoples' prioritisation of family obligations for before treatment are presented. Aboriginal patients must negotiate a health services system where racism and victim blaming are institutionalised, but the effect of these on the research relationship can be mitigated through reflexive practice. Using a framework for relational accountability that incorporates respect, responsibility and reciprocity can enable non-Aboriginal clinicians and/or researchers to work effectively with Aboriginal patients. These results may assist clinicians and policy makers develop strategies for improving quality of care.

Highlights

  • REVIEW ARTICLE‘Reflexive practice’ and the non-Indigenous clinician/researcher working with Aboriginal people

  • Context: Reflexivity is crucial for non-Aboriginal researchers working with Aboriginal people

  • I became increasingly aware of the struggles of many Aboriginal people with chronic diseases in negotiating a public health system where they were often viewed as non-compliant ‘others’[1] who contributed to their own poor health outcomes

Read more

Summary

REVIEW ARTICLE

‘Reflexive practice’ and the non-Indigenous clinician/researcher working with Aboriginal people. EF Rix, L Barclay, S Wilson University Centre for Rural Health, University of Sydney, Lismore, New South Wales, Australia. Submitted: 23 May 2013; Revised: August 2013; Accepted: October 2013; Published: 3 June 2014 Rix EF, Barclay L, Wilson S

Relational accountability
The process of developing reflexive practice
Tools for reflexive practice
Researcher positioning
Self reflexivity
Interpersonal reflexivity
Health system reflexivity
Lessons learned

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.