Abstract
This study aimed to compare the prediction performance of two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) semantic segmentation models for intracranial metastatic tumors with a volume ≥ 0.3 mL. We used postcontrast T1 whole-brain magnetic resonance (MR), which was collected from Taipei Veterans General Hospital (TVGH). Also, the study was approved by the institutional review board (IRB) of TVGH. The 2D image segmentation model does not fully use the spatial information between neighboring slices, whereas the 3D segmentation model does. We treated the U-Net as the basic model for 2D and 3D architectures. For the prediction of intracranial metastatic tumors, the area under the curve (AUC) of the 3D model was 87.6% and that of the 2D model was 81.5%. Building a semantic segmentation model based on 3D deep convolutional neural networks might be crucial to achieve a high detection rate in clinical applications for intracranial metastatic tumors.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
