Abstract

The governance of universities and colleges in the United States basically follows the concept and spirit of democracy embraced by the nation from its birth. The systems and practices in place at most U.S. institutions of higher learning include collaborative, representative, or collective decision-making arrangements known as shared governance. However, these systems and practices are hardly uniform due to the diversity of governance patterns that reflect the unique and different history, needs, and mission of a particular institution. Sometimes they are differentiated from, and contrasted with, corporate, business, and more authoritarian or centralized forms of institutional governance.
 In contrast with university governance elsewhere in the world—that can range from strong central government control to private self-regulated operations—the U.S. forms of campus governance have emerged in a country that does not have centralized authority over education. U.S. institutions of higher learning respond to a variety of controls and interests that are on display variously at public, private non-profit, private for-profit, and religious universities. Governance, authority, and administration are spread across a wide spectrum of players, including governing boards; presidents, chancellors, and other administrators; the academy/faculty; administrative staff; campus committees; students; and, even some external factors.
 Shared governance is not a perfect formula or panacea for university administration and decision-making. It does, however, provide a methodology, system, and concept that can help guide the leadership of a university as it approaches the administration and conduct of its educational responsibilities. In today’s higher education environment, the term governance is rather expansive. In one sense, it means top-down governance that is the rightful role and authority of an institutional board charged with overseeing policy, programming, performance, and executive guidance and evaluation. But, it also variously means the use of institutional strategies, operations, and components to distribute, disseminate, and “share” authority and responsibilities for a university’s administrative, management, and decision-making functions, i.e., “on-campus governance.” In this respect, shared governance “borrows” many of the attributes and principles of democratic government. In any case, shared governance, in its many forms and applications, is widely practiced in U.S. universities, including Delta State University.

Highlights

  • The governance of universities and colleges in the United States basically follows the concept and spirit of democracy embraced by the nation from its birth

  • This concept is widely considered to be a basic tenet of higher education, and it is a key factor in the administration and operation of American universities

  • All U.S universities are subject to a variety of governmental influence and oversight that can emanate from federal, state, and local governmental agencies and regulation

Read more

Summary

OVERVIEW

The governance of universities and colleges in the United States basically follows the concept and spirit of democracy embraced by the nation from its birth. The systems and practices in place at most U.S institutions of higher learning include collaborative, representative, or collective decision-making arrangements known as shared governance These systems and practices are hardly uniform due to the diversity of governance patterns that reflect the unique and different history, needs, and mission of a particular institution. Per se, includes a number of features that generally serve and support the manner in which decisions are made concerning the institution as a whole or one of its constituent components, and how a university is organized, managed, and operated. Those features vary according to the type, needs, and complexity of an institution. Governance, authority, and administration are spread across a wide spectrum of players, including governing boards; presidents, chancellors, and other administrators; the academy/faculty; administrative staff; campus committees; students; and, even some external factors

SHARED GOVERNANCE
Governing Board
Key Administrators
President’s Cabinet or Council
The Faculty and the Faculty Senate
Academic Council
Academic Colleges and Schools
4.10. Administrative Staff Council
4.11. Campus Committees and Task Forces
4.14. Student Engagement
Institutional and Program Accreditation and Certification
Governmental Involvement and Oversight
Professional Associations
Unions
Relevant Legal Precedents and American Jurisprudence
Media Influence
Shared Governance Practices and Engagement at Delta State University
CONCLUSION
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.