Abstract

Bovine and camel chymosin are aspartic peptidases that are used industrially in cheese production. They cleave the Phe105-Met106 bond of the milk protein κ-casein, releasing its predominantly negatively charged C-terminus, which leads to the separation of the milk into curds and whey. Despite having 85% sequence identity, camel chymosin shows a 70% higher milk-clotting activity than bovine chymosin towards bovine milk. The activities, structures, thermal stabilities and glycosylation patterns of bovine and camel chymosin obtained by fermentation in Aspergillus niger have been examined. Different variants of the enzymes were isolated by hydrophobic interaction chromatography and showed variations in their glycosylation, N-terminal sequences and activities. Glycosylation at Asn291 and the loss of the first three residues of camel chymosin significantly decreased its activity. Thermal differential scanning calorimetry revealed a slightly higher thermal stability of camel chymosin compared with bovine chymosin. The crystal structure of a doubly glycosylated variant of camel chymosin was determined at a resolution of 1.6 Å and the crystal structure of unglycosylated bovine chymosin was redetermined at a slightly higher resolution (1.8 Å) than previously determined structures. Camel and bovine chymosin share the same overall fold, except for the antiparallel central β-sheet that connects the N-terminal and C-terminal domains. In bovine chymosin the N-terminus forms one of the strands which is lacking in camel chymosin. This difference leads to an increase in the flexibility of the relative orientation of the two domains in the camel enzyme. Variations in the amino acids delineating the substrate-binding cleft suggest a greater flexibility in the ability to accommodate the substrate in camel chymosin. Both enzymes possess local positively charged patches on their surface that can play a role in interactions with the overall negatively charged C-terminus of κ-casein. Camel chymosin contains two additional positive patches that favour interaction with the substrate. The improved electrostatic interactions arising from variation in the surface charges and the greater malleability both in domain movements and substrate binding contribute to the better milk-clotting activity of camel chymosin towards bovine milk.

Highlights

  • Cheese production represents one of the earliest biotechnological applications of enzymes (Szecsi, 1992)

  • We report the separation and characterization of the variants of camel chymosin obtained from expression in A. niger and the crystal structure of one of the variants of camel chymosin to 1.6 Aresolution

  • The singly glycosylated variants have slightly higher melting points than the doubly and unglycosylated variants. This suggests that glycosylation at Asn100, the more favoured site, with bound NAG is an integral part of a structure with higher molecular mass

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Cheese production represents one of the earliest biotechnological applications of enzymes (Szecsi, 1992). The active site contains an activated water molecule held in position by two Asp residues: one from each domain (Cooper et al, 1990; Gilliland et al, 1990; Sielecki et al, 1990; Newman et al, 1991). The primary aim of the research presented here is to provide a structural understanding of why camel chymosin possesses a higher milk-clotting activity towards bovine milk than bovine chymosin. Based on X-ray synchrotron-radiation data, the structure of bovine chymosin has been redetermined to 1.8 Aresolution These structures form the basis for detailed structural comparison that has identified structural differences that can explain the better performance of camel chymosin in terms of substrate recognition and action on -casein

Reagents and proteins
Separation of variants
Mass spectrometry The protein mass was measured using a Voyager Elite
Determination of glycosylation types and sites
Assay for enzymatic activity
Thermal stability measurements
Crystallization experiments
2.10. Data collection and structure refinement
2.11. Electrostatic calculations
Separation and characterization of variants
Discussion
Impact of glycosylation
Surface charge
N-terminus
Substrate binding
10. Dordrecht
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call