Abstract

Weight regain after caloric restriction results in accelerated fat storage in adipose tissue. This catch-up fat phenomenon is postulated to result partly from suppressed skeletal muscle thermogenesis, but the underlying mechanisms are elusive. We investigated whether the reduced rate of skeletal muscle contraction-relaxation cycle that occurs after caloric restriction persists during weight recovery and could contribute to catch-up fat. Using a rat model of semistarvation-refeeding, in which fat recovery is driven by suppressed thermogenesis, we show that contraction and relaxation of leg muscles are slower after both semistarvation and refeeding. These effects are associated with (i) higher expression of muscle deiodinase type 3 (DIO3), which inactivates tri-iodothyronine (T3), and lower expression of T3-activating enzyme, deiodinase type 2 (DIO2), (ii) slower net formation of T3 from its T4 precursor in muscles, and (iii) accumulation of slow fibers at the expense of fast fibers. These semistarvation-induced changes persisted during recovery and correlated with impaired expression of transcription factors involved in slow-twitch muscle development. We conclude that diminished muscle thermogenesis following caloric restriction results from reduced muscle T3 levels, alteration in muscle-specific transcription factors, and fast-to-slow fiber shift causing slower contractility. These energy-sparing effects persist during weight recovery and contribute to catch-up fat.

Highlights

  • Mammals adapt to food scarcity by increasing the efficiency of energy utilization

  • Effects of Semistarvation-refeeding on Rat Body Weight and Triceps Size In accordance with our earlier observations with this model (Crescenzo et al, 2003; Cettour-Rose et al, 2005; Mainieri et al, 2006), caloric restriction led to growth arrest, whereas isocaloric refeeding led to weight gain at a slightly higher rate than in the control rats

  • From a molecular point of view, we demonstrated that semistarvation-refeeding caused major changes in the muscular expression of transcription factors that control slow vs. fast phenotype, and of the deiodinases DIO1, DIO2, and DIO3, which is in agreement with decreased availability of muscular T3, the main active thyroid hormone

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Mammals adapt to food scarcity by increasing the efficiency of energy utilization. This has been documented in longitudinal studies of starvation and caloric restriction in humans as well as animals (Keys et al, 1950; Keesey and Powley, 2008) and is regarded as an outcome of adaptive processes to a deficit in energy intake. There is evidence that this ability persists, at least in part, during weight recovery upon refeeding (Boyle et al, 1978; Harris and Martin, 1984; Hill et al, 1984) and that the energy conserved is directed at accelerating the recovery of the body’s adipose tissue rather than that of other tissues in animals (Dulloo and Girardier, 1990; MacLean et al, 2004; Evans et al, 2005) and in humans (Dulloo and Jacquet, 1998; Weyer et al, 2000) This preference for “catchup fat” is viewed as a result of a feedback loop between adipose tissue and thermogenesis (Dulloo and Jacquet, 2001); it probably evolved to optimize survival capacity during an ancestral life characterized by periodic food shortage. This preferential catch-up fat phenomenon has been linked to the hyperinsulinemic state of catchup growth and the associated risks for later development of the metabolic syndrome (Crescenzo et al, 2003; Dulloo et al, 2006)

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call