Callus distraction for brachymetatarsia – A comparison between an internal device and the external fixator

Abstract

BackgroundSymptomatic patients with severe brachymetatarsia are commonly treated with callus distraction using external mini-fixator (EF) or internal device (ID). This study points out advantages and limitations of both methods comparing clinical and radiographical parameters. MethodsRetrospective analysis of 21 metatarsal bones in twelve patients. Twelve metatarsals were treated with ID (Genos Mini), nine with EF (MiniRail). ResultsMean lengthening distance was 17.3 mm using EF and 11.7 mm using ID (p = 0.016). Adverse results were observed in 89% of metatarsals treated with EF and in 33% treated with ID (p = 0.011). Postoperative surgical intervention was required in 33% using EF compared to 0% using ID (p = 0.031). Mean total German Foot Function Index (FFI-T) improved from 49 to 33 using EF and from 47 to 22 using ID (p < 0.001). ConclusionCD is a reliable surgical treatment for BMT. Surgeons should be aware of implant-related advantages and complications when counseling patients about treatment options.