Abstract

For territorial group-living species, opportunities to reproduce on the natal territory can be limited by a number of factors including the availability of resources within a territory, access to unrelated individuals, and monopolies on reproduction by dominant group members. Individuals looking to reproduce are therefore faced with the options of either waiting for a breeding opportunity to arise in the natal territory, or searching for reproductive opportunities in non-natal groups. In the cooperatively breeding Southern pied babbler, Turdoides bicolor, most individuals who achieve reproductive success do so through taking up dominant breeding positions within non-natal groups. For subordinate pied babblers therefore, searching for breeding opportunities in non-natal groups is of primary importance as this represents the major route to reproductive success. However, prospecting (where individuals leave the group to search for reproductive opportunities within other groups) is costly and individuals rapidly lose weight when not part of a group. Here we demonstrate that subordinate pied babblers adopt an alternative strategy for mate attraction by vocal advertisement from within their natal territories. We show that subordinates focus their calling efforts on the edges of their territory, and specifically near boundaries with neighbouring groups that have potential breeding partners (unrelated individuals of the opposite sex). In contrast to prospecting, calling individuals showed no body mass loss associated with this behaviour, suggesting that calling from within the group may provide a ‘cheap’ advertisement strategy. Additionally, we show that subordinates use information regarding the composition of neighbouring groups to target the greatest number of potential mating partners.

Highlights

  • For species that live in family groups, opportunities to reproduce on the natal territory are limited by both the availability of resources within a territory, and access to unrelated individuals [1,2,3]

  • In the one case where more calls per hectare were produced on a related boundary, the calls occurred in an area that overlapped with the boundary of an unrelated neighbouring group

  • When we looked at whether subordinates targeted groups that had the highest number of unrelated, opposite sex adult individuals, we found that they called more in proximity to their neighbouring group that contained the highest number of potential breeding partners, giving both more calls per hectare (Fig 3C; paired t-test, t = 3.544, df = 6, P = 0.012) and calling in more locations per hectare (S4 Fig; paired t-test, t = 3.805, df = 6, P = 0.022) when compared to their neighbouring group that contained the fewest potential breeding partners

Read more

Summary

Introduction

For species that live in family groups, opportunities to reproduce on the natal territory are limited by both the availability of resources within a territory, and access to unrelated individuals [1,2,3]. An additional limitation arises when reproduction within the group is monopolised by a single dominant pair [4,5,6]. For subordinates within these groups, opportunities to reproduce are restricted to either waiting for a breeding opportunity to become available within the natal territory, or searching for breeding opportunities in the surrounding area [7,8]. In all three of these strategies subordinates must signal their intentions to individuals that live outside of the natal territory

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call