Abstract

Many U.S. corporate bonds are either callable or convertible. While callable bonds provide a higher coupon to bondholders in exchange for a firm's repurchase option of its claim, convertible bonds offer investors the option to exchange a firm's debt to equity. This paper analyzes the choice between these two debt contracts. Using a dynamic capital structure theory model that includes an investment choice, we show that firms which are more exposed to debt overhang issue callable rather than convertible bonds. Convertible bonds are preferred if the firm has a higher initial level of debt. However, if bonds have covenants attached, the firm is more likely to issue callable bonds. Our empirical findings support the theory.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.