Abstract
AbstractTwo significant opinions on mediation confidentiality from opposite coasts emerged this summer. Alternatives' editor Russ Bleemer, and Timothy Klimpl, of New York, analyze the result in the closely watched California Supreme Court Simmons v. Ghaderi case, which provides strong support for the state's mediation protection statutes. Confidentiality is on shakier ground in the hands of New York's top court, with details provided about the Court's affirmance of a subpoena for a mediator's testimony and records. Jillian Lee Hunt, of New York, looks at another California Supreme Court case on the limits of arbitrator power, and there is a report on a United Kingdom survey revealing an insufficient use of employment mediation.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
