Abstract

Cost-efficient single-polarized X-band radars are a feasible alternative due to their high sensitivity and resolution, which makes them well suited for complex precipitation patterns. The first horizontal scanning weather radar in Peru was installed in Piura in 2019, after the devastating impact of the 2017 coastal El Niño. To obtain a calibrated rain rate from radar reflectivity, we employ a modified empirical approach and draw a direct comparison to a well-established machine learning technique used for radar QPE. For both methods, preprocessing steps are required, such as clutter and noise elimination, atmospheric, geometric, and precipitation-induced attenuation correction, and hardware variations. For the new empirical approach, the corrected reflectivity is related to rain gauge observations, and a spatially and temporally variable parameter set is iteratively determined. The machine learning approach uses a set of features mainly derived from the radar data. The random forest (RF) algorithm employed here learns from the features and builds decision trees to obtain quantitative precipitation estimates for each bin of detected reflectivity. Both methods capture the spatial variability of rainfall quite well. Validating the empirical approach, it performed better with an overall linear regression slope of 0.65 and r of 0.82. The RF approach had limitations with the quantitative representation (slope = 0.44 and r = 0.65), but it more closely matches the reflectivity distribution, and it is independent of real-time rain-gauge data. Possibly, a weighted mean of both approaches can be used operationally on a daily basis.

Highlights

  • Introduction iationsRecent events of extreme rainfall in several regions around the world have stressed the need for reliable rainfall estimates for larger areas

  • This allows assessing the detection sensitivity for rainfall, and unsurprisingly, the radar data have a much higher detection rate, due to them being an integral measurement of a volume of the atmosphere, while rain gauges only sample a very small surface area

  • The detection rate for rainfall shows that one-third of all rainfall events are only detected by the radar, while it misses only 9% of rainfall events measured by rain gauges (Table 5), which is possibly due to the sectors with strong beam blockage and attenuation, which cannot be completely compensated

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Introduction iationsRecent events of extreme rainfall in several regions around the world have stressed the need for reliable rainfall estimates for larger areas. Heavy summer rains with flashfloods, landslides, widespread damage, and high numbers of fatalities were reported from countries such as Germany, Belgium, Austria, China, and the Ukraine in July 2021 alone [1]. With the addition of weather radar, dynamic development and localized extreme values of these events can be monitored and predicted so that the population can be alerted in an adequate manner and authorities and operators of hydrologic infrastructure can react to upcoming dangers. This is especially relevant for the coastal region of North Peru, where only recently the first weather radar was implemented on the campus of the Universidad.

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call