Calibration of tipping‐bucket flow meters and rain gauges to measure gross rainfall, throughfall, and stemflow applied to data from a Japanese temperate coniferous forest and a Cambodian tropical deciduous forest

Abstract

AbstractTipping‐bucket flow meter and rain gauge (TBFM/TBRG) are widely used for the measurement of gross rainfall (GR), throughfall (TF), and stemflow (SF) to evaluate the amount of interception loss (I). However, TBFM/TBRG cannot measure the inflow rate during tipping and underestimates the inflow rate. To correct this systematic bias, 33 total calibrations were conducted for five types of TBFM/TBRG in the laboratory. The tipping time increased with the bucket volume, and the underestimation during one tip was higher for TBFM/TBRG of larger capacity. With the use of the scaled actual inflow rate and the actual volume of a single tip from the measured static volume of a single tip when the inflow rate is zero, the common calibration curves were obtained as quadratic equations for each of the five types within an error range of ±3%. We measured GR and TF by using TBRG and TBFM with a resolution of 0.2 mm and measured SF by TBRG with a single‐tip static volume of 15.7 cm3 in a Japanese temperate coniferous forest (TCF) and a Cambodian tropical deciduous forest (TDF). At both sites, the calibration curves needed to be applied to obtain GR, TF, and SF on an event scale with an underestimation degree of less than 3%. Without applying any calibrations, the higher rainfall intensities in TDF caused larger underestimations of GR, TF, and SF and larger overestimations of I compared with results for TCF. On an annual scale, the degree of overestimation of I relative to GR (ΔI/GR) was 1.2% in TCF and 3.5% in TDF, and ΔI/I was at least 10% at both sites. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.