Abstract

The net ecosystem exchange (NEE) of carbon flux can be partitioned into gross primary productivity (GPP) and respiration ( R). The contribution of remote sensing and modeling holds the potential to predict these components and map them spatially and temporally. This has obvious utility to quantify carbon sink and source relationships and to identify improved land management strategies for optimizing carbon sequestration. The objective of our study was to evaluate prediction of 14-day average daytime CO 2 fluxes ( F day) and nighttime CO 2 fluxes ( R n) using remote sensing and other data. F day and R n were measured with a Bowen ratio–energy balance (BREB) technique in a sagebrush ( Artemisia spp.)–steppe ecosystem in northeast Idaho, USA, during 1996–1999. Micrometeorological variables aggregated across 14-day periods and time-integrated Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR) Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (iNDVI) were determined during four growing seasons (1996–1999) and used to predict F day and R n. We found that iNDVI was a strong predictor of F day ( R 2=0.79, n=66, P<0.0001). Inclusion of evapotranspiration in the predictive equation led to improved predictions of F day ( R 2=0.82, n=66, P<0.0001). Crossvalidation indicated that regression tree predictions of F day were prone to overfitting and that linear regression models were more robust. Multiple regression and regression tree models predicted R n quite well ( R 2=0.75–0.77, n=66) with the regression tree model being slightly more robust in crossvalidation. Temporal mapping of F day and R n is possible with these techniques and would allow the assessment of NEE in sagebrush–steppe ecosystems. Simulations of periodic F day measurements, as might be provided by a mobile flux tower, indicated that such measurements could be used in combination with iNDVI to accurately predict F day. These periodic measurements could maximize the utility of expensive flux towers for evaluating various carbon management strategies, carbon certification, and validation and calibration of carbon flux models.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.