Abstract

The phenomenon of car-following is special in traffic operations. Traditional car-following models can well describe the reactions of the movements between two concessive vehicles in the same lane within a certain distance. With the invention of connected vehicle technologies, more and more advisory messages are in development and applied in our daily lives, some of which are related to the measures and warnings of speed and headway distance between the two concessive vehicles. Such warnings may change the conventional car-following mechanisms. This paper intends to consider the possible impacts of in-vehicle warning messages to improve the traditional car-following models, including the General Motor (GM) Model and the Linear (Helly) Model, by calibrating model parameters using field data from an arterial road in Houston, Texas, U.S.A. The safety messages were provided by a tablet/smartphone application. One exponent was applied to the GM model, while another one applied to the Linear (Helly) model, both were on the stimuli term “difference in velocity between two concessive vehicles”. The calibration and validation were separately conducted for deceleration and acceleration conditions. Results showed that, the parameters of the traditional GM model failed to be properly calibrated with the interference of in-vehicle safety messages, and the parameters calibrated from the traditional Linear (Helly) Model with no in-vehicle messages could not be directly used in the case with such messages. However, both updated models can be well calibrated even if those messages were provided. The entire research process, as well as the calibrated models and parameters could be a reference in the on-going connected vehicle program and micro/macroscopic traffic simulations.

Highlights

  • These messages could be provided by Dedicated Short Range Communication (DSRC) technologies using a dedicated device such as the Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) [25], a tablet/smartphone application [26], etc

  • In the rest of this paper, these two types of models are further updated by incorporating the impacts of advance warning messages from a tablet/smartphone application

  • General Motor (GM) models are perhaps the most famous class of car-following models with its first version dated more than 60 years ago

Read more

Summary

Background of Research

Car-following is a special process in traffic operation where a following vehicle adjusts its accelerations based on the performance of the leading vehicle(s) and current status of the following vehicle. With the invention of many innovative technologies, The United States Department of Transportation (USDOT) initiated a Connected Vehicle (CV) program to develop a platform combining well-defined technologies, interfaces, and processes to minimize risks and enhance the overall performance of traffic operations. It includes the Connected Vehicle Human Factors Research focusing on “understanding, assessing, planning for, and counteracting the effects of signals or system-generated messages that take the driver’s eyes off the road (visual distraction), the driver’s mind off the driving task (cognitive distraction), and the driver’s hands off the steering wheel (manual distraction)” [13]. This creates a challenge on how to incorporate the impacts of such supplementary warning messages into traditional car-following models

Research Objectives
Warning Messages with Connected Vehicles
Interaction between Two Adjacent Vehicles and Types of Car-Following Models
Revised GM Car-Following Models Considering Impacts of Warning Messages
Test Route
Equipment and Devices
Tablet Messages
Data Collection and Post-Recording
Data Processing
Calibration and Analytical Procedure
Calibration of Revised GM Model
Validation of Both Revised Models
Conclusions
Findings
Objectives
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call