Abstract

The lack of accurate simulation model parameters in the optimization design process of variable fertilizer application devices has resulted in large errors between simulation and theoretical calculation results, which has restricted the development of variable fertilizer application devices to a certain extent. Additionally, there are few scholars studying urea granules, so many parameters of urea granular fertilizer cannot be directly obtained from the literature. The aim of this study is to calibrate a set of simulation parameters by combining physical and simulation tests. In this study, intrinsic parameters were systematically determined, including the particle size, particle density, elastic modulus, Poisson’s ratio and their static friction coefficients, rolling friction coefficients and restitution coefficients of urea particles. By performing the urea particle stacking test, the static friction coefficient between urea particles was calibrated to 0.27, and the rolling friction coefficient between particles was 0.11. To check the reliability of the calibration parameters, the simulation and physical tests of the repose angle and bulk density of urea particles were compared, and the results show that the relative error of repose angles and bulk density of urea particles was 0.78% and 1.19%, respectively. Through the simulation of the mechanical variable fertilizer discharger and the comparison test of the benchtop fertilizer discharging performance, the maximum relative error between the simulation and physical test fertilizer discharge is 3.69% when the working length of the outer sheave is 25 mm; the maximum relative error between the simulation and physical test fertilizer discharge is 3.39% when the working length is 35 mm; the maximum relative error between the simulation and physical test fertilizer discharge is 6.86% when the working length is 45 mm; the maximum relative error between the simulation and physical test fertilizer discharge is 4.95% when the working length is 55 mm. The maximum relative error between the simulated and physical test fertilizer discharge was 6.86% at 45 mm opening and 4.95% at 55 mm opening, and the results show that the urea particle calibration parameters are reliable. The results of this study can provide a theoretical reference for the optimization design and simulation study of variable fertilizer application devices.

Highlights

  • Agricultural fertilizers play a significant role in agricultural production as an important production material that can effectively contribute to the increase in crop yield and income [1]

  • The static friction coefficient more significantly affects the repose angle than the rolling friction coefficient

  • The results indicate that the calibrated values of urea particle simulation parameters in this study are reliable

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Agricultural fertilizers play a significant role in agricultural production as an important production material that can effectively contribute to the increase in crop yield and income [1]. Active organic fertilizers that can produce pollution-free and pollution-free green foods have emerged, chemical fertilizers still occupy an important position in modern agricultural production. For a considerable time period in the future, the application of chemical fertilizers will remain one of the indispensable means to achieving sustainable agricultural development [2]. Variable fertilizer application technology is an important part of modern precision agriculture technology, which is of great significance to the healthy and sustainable development of agriculture in China. Mechanized fertilizer application is the prerequisite foundation to realize the variable fertilizer application technology. The mechanized fertilizer application method is mainly based on slotted-wheel fertilizer application and disc-type fertilizer spreading [4,5]. As one of the most widely used fertilizer dispersers in fertilizer application machinery in China, external slotted-wheel fertilizer dispersers have difficulty in precisely controlling the amount of fertilizer and uneven fertilizer dispersal [6]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.