Abstract

Abstract. Experimental and theoretical uncertainties in the measurement of cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) with a continuous-flow thermal-gradient CCN counter from Droplet Measurement Technologies (DMT-CCNC) have been assessed by model calculations and calibration experiments with ammonium sulfate and sodium chloride aerosol particles in the diameter range of 20–220 nm. Experiments have been performed in the laboratory and during field measurement campaigns, covering a wide range of instrument operating conditions (650–1020 hPa pressure, 293–303 K inlet temperature, 4–34 K m−1 temperature gradient, 0.5–1.0 L min−1 flow rate). For each set of conditions, the effective water vapor supersaturation (Seff, 0.05–1.4%) was determined from the measured CCN activation spectra (dry particle activation diameters) and Köhler model calculations. High measurement precision was achieved under stable laboratory conditions, where the relative standard deviations of Seff were as low as ±1%. During field measurements, however, the relative deviations increased to about ±5%, which can be mostly attributed to variations of the CCNC column top temperature with ambient temperature. The observed dependence of Seff on temperature, pressure, and flow rate was compared to the CCNC flow model of Lance et al. (2006). At high Seff the relative deviations between flow model and experimental results were mostly less than 10%, but at Seff≤0.1% they exceeded 40%. Thus, careful experimental calibration is required for high-accuracy CCN measurements – especially at low Seff. A comprehensive comparison and uncertainty analysis of the various Köhler models and thermodynamic parameterizations commonly used in CCN studies showed that the relative deviations between different approaches are as high as 25% for (NH4)2SO4 and 12% for NaCl. The deviations were mostly caused by the different parameterizations for the activity of water in aqueous solutions of the two salts. To ensure comparability of results, we suggest that CCN studies should always report exactly which Köhler model equations and parameters were used. Provided that the Aerosol Inorganics Model (AIM) can be regarded as an accurate source of water activity data for highly dilute solutions of (NH4)2SO4 and NaCl, only Köhler models that are based on the AIM or yield similar results should be used in CCN studies involving these salts and aiming at high accuracy. Experiments with (NH4)2SO4 and NaCl aerosols showed that the conditions of particle generation and the shape and microstructure of NaCl particles are critical for their application in CCN activation experiments (relative deviations up to 18%).

Highlights

  • Aerosol particles serving as cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) play an important role in the formation of clouds and precipitation, and they influence atmospheric chemistry and physics, the hydrological cycle, and climate (Pruppacher and Klett, 1997; Seinfeld and Pandis, 1998; Lohmann and Feichter, 2005)

  • We describe how the Droplet Measurement Technologies (DMT)-cloud condensation nuclei counter (CCNC) can be efficiently calibrated by experiments using salt aerosol particles of known size and composition, and the corresponding Kohler model calculations (Sect. 2, Appendix A)

  • We investigate and quantify the variability and uncertainty of measurements and data analysis (Sects. 3.1–3.4), and we test the applicability of a CCNC flow model by Lance et al (2006) for extrapolating DMT-CCNC calibration results to different measurement conditions

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Aerosol particles serving as cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) play an important role in the formation of clouds and precipitation, and they influence atmospheric chemistry and physics, the hydrological cycle, and climate (Pruppacher and Klett, 1997; Seinfeld and Pandis, 1998; Lohmann and Feichter, 2005). The response of cloud characteristics and precipitation processes to increasing anthropogenic aerosol concentrations represents one of the largest uncertainties in the current understanding of climate change (Andreae et al, 2005; IAPSAG, 2007; IPCC, 2007). One of the crucial underlying challenges is to determine the ability of aerosol particles to act as CCN under relevant atmospheric conditions, an issue that has received increasing attention over the past years (McFiggans et al, 2006; IAPSAG, 2007)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.