Abstract

Abstract. In this article we introduce new methods for the calibration of depth images from focused plenoptic cameras and validate the results. We start with a brief description of the concept of a focused plenoptic camera and how from the recorded raw image a depth map can be estimated. For this camera, an analytical expression of the depth accuracy is derived for the first time. In the main part of the paper, methods to calibrate a focused plenoptic camera are developed and evaluated. The optical imaging process is calibrated by using a method which is already known from the calibration of traditional cameras. For the calibration of the depth map two new model based methods, which make use of the projection concept of the camera are developed. These new methods are compared to a common curve fitting approach, which is based on Taylor-series-approximation. Both model based methods show significant advantages compared to the curve fitting method. They need less reference points for calibration than the curve fitting method and moreover, supply a function which is valid in excess of the range of calibration. In addition the depth map accuracy of the plenoptic camera was experimentally investigated for different focal lengths of the main lens and is compared to the analytical evaluation.

Highlights

  • The concept of a plenoptic camera already has been developed more than hundred years ago (Ives, 1903, Lippmann, 1908)

  • For both focal lengths the results of the three calibration series are presented in the tables

  • In this article we developed an analytical expression for the depth map accuracy supplied by a focused plenoptic camera

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The concept of a plenoptic camera already has been developed more than hundred years ago (Ives, 1903, Lippmann, 1908). There exist basically two concepts of a plenoptic camera which use a micro lens array (MLA) in front of the sensor. Those two concepts are the ”unfocused” plenoptic camera developed by Ng (Ng, 2006) and the focused plenoptic camera, which was described for the first time by Lunsdaine and Georgiev (Lunsdaine and Georgiev, 2008). One big advantage of it compared to the ”unfocused” plenoptic camera is the high resolution of the synthesized image This is beneficial for estimating a depth map out of the recorded raw image (Perwass and Wietzke, 2012)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call