Abstract

Summary Growing interest in the structure and dynamics of animal social networks has stimulated efforts to develop automated tracking technologies that can reliably record encounters in free‐ranging subjects. A particularly promising approach is the use of animal‐attached ‘proximity loggers’, which collect data on the incidence, duration and proximity of spatial associations through inter‐logger radio communication. While proximity logging is based on a straightforward physical principle – the attenuation of propagating radio waves with distance – calibrating systems for field deployment is challenging, since most study species roam across complex, heterogeneous environments.In this study, we calibrated a recently developed digital proximity‐logging system (‘Encounternet’) for deployment on a wild population of New Caledonian crows Corvus moneduloides. Our principal objective was to establish a quantitative model that enables robust post hoc estimation of logger‐to‐logger (and, hence, crow‐to‐crow) distances from logger‐recorded signal‐strength values. To achieve an accurate description of the radio communication between crow‐borne loggers, we conducted a calibration exercise that combines theoretical analyses, field experiments, statistical modelling, behavioural observations, and computer simulations.We show that, using signal‐strength information only, it is possible to assign crow encounters reliably to predefined distance classes, enabling powerful analyses of social dynamics. For example, raw data sets from field‐deployed loggers can be filtered at the analysis stage to include predominantly encounters where crows would have come to within a few metres of each other, and could therefore have socially learned new behaviours through direct observation. One of the main challenges for improving data classification further is the fact that crows – like most other study species – associate across a wide variety of habitats and behavioural contexts, with different signal‐attenuation properties.Our study demonstrates that well‐calibrated proximity‐logging systems can be used to chart social associations of free‐ranging animals over a range of biologically meaningful distances. At the same time, however, it highlights that considerable efforts are required to conduct study‐specific system calibrations that adequately account for the biological and technological complexities of field deployments. Although we report results from a particular case study, the basic rationale of our multi‐step calibration exercise applies to many other tracking systems and study species.

Highlights

  • The structure of animal social networks has profound consequences for a wide range of phenomena, including the transmission of genes, pathogens and social information

  • We need to ‘invert’ this master calibration, in which distance is related to received signal strength indicator’ (RSSI), to enable conversion of field-recorded RSSI values into distance estimates, or rather probability distributions of distances. While these two problems are difficult to tackle in a parametric statistical framework, it is reasonably straightforward to simulate the distribution of RSSI values one would expect to be generated by tags on a population of wild, free-ranging crows, using: outputs from our statistical model (Step 3); additional information about our study system; and some basic assumptions

  • While the choice of the RSSI value used for post hoc filtering of field datasets is arbitrary, our analyses have shown that Encounternet enables reliable distance-binning in our application; the value used here (RSSI ≥ 15) achieves our original goal of identifying ‘short range’ associations between crows, and distinguishing them from more distant encounters

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The structure of animal social networks has profound consequences for a wide range of phenomena, including the transmission of genes, pathogens and social information (reviews: Croft et al 2008; Whitehead 2008; Kurvers et al 2014; Pinter-Wollman et al 2014). In the majority of cases, researchers infer social networks from data on the spatial grouping of study subjects. Much higher sampling rates are required (in the order of once per hour or minute), to fully explore the biological causes and consequences of dynamically changing network topologies (Blonder et al 2012; Krause et al 2013; Pinter-Wollman et al 2014; Rands 2014; Sih and Wey 2014)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call