Calf vessel preservation in peripheral vascular disease—angiography versus pulse generated run-off

Abstract

Previous angiographic and radiological studies have suggested that the peroneal artery is the best preserved of the calf vessels in peripheral vascular disease and should be a site of preference for a femorodistal bypass graft. Calf vessel run-off assessed by pulse generated run-off (PGR) provides a more accurate prediction of graft success or failure than angiography and may therefore give a better functional picture of vessel patency than angiography. This study compares the presence and degree of preservation of the three calf vessels in patients with severe peripheral vascular disease using both intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography (IADSA) and PGR. Thirty-four limbs in patients with either ischaemic rest pain, ulceration or gangrene were studied and the results were scored according to the extent and severity of disease in the peroneal, posterior tibial and anterior tibial arteries. On IADSA, the peroneal artery was patent significantly more often (79%) than the posterior tibial artery (47%) or the anterior tibial artery (38%). Conversely, PGR examination showed no difference in patency between the three vessels (peroneal 91%, posterior tibial 88%, anterior tibial 79%). The peroneal artery was also significantly better preserved on IADSA (65%) compared to the posterior tibial artery (38%) and the anterior tibial artery (23%). PGR studies again showed no difference in the best preserved vessel between peroneal (47%), posterior tibial (50%) and anterior tibial (50%) arteries. Thus, the peroneal artery appears the better preserved vessel on angiography but this appearance may be misleading because the more functional PGR studies show no significant difference in the patency or degree of preservation of the three calf vessels.