Abstract
AbstractThe response of the boundary layer wind profile and the surface shear to a large step change in surface roughness is predicted by three calculation methods and the predictions are compared with measurements by Bradley. The first method, which assumes that local equilibrium exists everywhere in the adjusting region, performs less well than the second and third methods, which both employ a transport equation for the shear stress. It is also shown that the extra sophistication of the third method, in allowing for the non‐local effects on the dissipation length scale, does not give consistently better results than the second method.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
