Abstract
Pade approximants give Stark effect energies for excited states of hydrogen that are considerably more accurate than simple perturbation theory. In one example, Pade approximants for an n=25 state lie within the experimental uncertainty, while simple perturbation theory lies outside. In a second example, Pade approximants for an n=30 state fall inside the theoretical ionisation width, while simple perturbation theory falls outside. This behaviour appears to be general.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have