Abstract
Jet mixing noise data at different measurement distances are compared with values calculated from the Lockheed prediction method. Although the method does not include any acoustic near-field effects, the measured and predicted results agree well where the measured data deviates from the inverse square law. It is therefore suggested that departures from the inverse square law are primarily the result of (1) the non-negligible distance between the nozzle exit plane and the true axial source location and (2) the jet mixing noise directionality, as modeled in the prediction method. Allowing for these effects, jet noise data at 8 and 96 diameters over a wide range of frequencies, angles and jet conditions are shown to collapse with reasonable accuracy.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
