Abstract
The validity of the Stenqvist-Sonander formula for calculating the end-expiratory fraction of carbon dioxide (FACO2) in the coaxial Mapleson D (Bain) systems was evaluated using a lung model for simulated spontaneous breathing with an optional respiratory wave form. Two different respiratory flow patterns were used, one representing relaxed breathing in a volunteer and one resembling the respiration found in halothane anaesthesia. Each pattern was used with five different fresh gas flows and three different respiratory rates. The formula was found to be quite accurate when the flow pattern of an awake volunteer was simulated, but it underestimated the observed FETCO2 value by about 10% in halothane breathing. It is concluded that the formula can be recommended for use in theoretical and educational situations but that it is too complicated for application in clinical practice.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
