Abstract

A comparative analysis is provided of the effect of different solvent models on the calculation of a potential of mean force (PMF) for determining the absolute binding affinity of the small molecule inhibitor pteroic acid bound to ricin toxin A-chain (RTA). Solvent models include the distance-dependent dielectric constant, several different generalized Born (GB) approximations, and a hybrid explicit/GB-based implicit solvent model. We found that the simpler approximation of dielectric screening and a GB model, with Born radii fitted to a switching-window dielectric-boundary surface Poisson solvent model, severely overpredicted the binding affinity as compared to the experimental value, estimated to range from -4.4 to -6.0 kcal/mol. In contrast, GB models that are parametrized to fit the Lee-Richards molecular surface performed much better, predicting binding free energy within 1-3 kcal/mol of experimental estimates. However, the predicted free-energy profiles of these GB models displayed alternative binding modes not observed in the crystal structure. Finally, the most rigorous and computationally costly approach in this work, which used a hybrid explicit/implicit solvent model, correctly determined a binding funnel in the PMF near the crystallographic bound state and predicted an absolute binding affinity that was 2 kcal/mol more favorable than the estimated experimental binding affinity.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call