Abstract
Cohen and Dehaene (Cognitive Neuropsychology, 2000, Vol. 17, pp. 563-583) reported the case of a pure alexic patient who preserved some calculation abilities despite severely impaired Arabic numeral reading. They argued that these residual abilities and the general pattern of performance of the patient can be fully explained within their anatomo-functional triple-code model. Here, we show how the lack of specification of the assumed architecture, the failure to provide sufficiently detailed data, and the absence of adequate refutation of alternative accounts make this study unsuitable for constraining theories of numerical cognition.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.