Abstract
Systems biology is an excellent research topic for social scientists because systems biologists themselves are fascinated by the social organization of their field. Moreover, as systems biology is an emerging research area, studying it from a sociological perspective allows social scientists to observe how scientists develop new fields of inquiry and practice, and challenge existing institutional and disciplinary structures. This article presents the results of our study of systems biology and of how systems biologists perceive their own field. We start by exploring the organization of knowledge production in systems biology, which is a research 'approach' that brings together biologists, physicists, engineers, mathematicians and computer scientists in novel interdisciplinary arrangements. We then look at how systems biology positions itself in relation to other types of biological inquiry, particularly molecular biology. > …some systems biologists aim to make biology as quantitative, rigorous and predictive as physics and engineering… Discussions of the distinctiveness of systems biology often address the goals of the field: some systems biologists aim to make biology as quantitative, rigorous and predictive as physics and engineering, with the overall objective of making living systems calculable and ultimately predictable; others argue that this aspiration is misplaced, and stress the contingency and unruliness of biology. We explore these tensions, and reflect on their sociological dimensions and their consequences for future interdisciplinary work in the life sciences. This article presents results from our empirical research. We draw on more than 50 interviews with systems biologists from the USA, UK and Japan, as well as attendance at systems biology conferences and workshops, extended visits to laboratories and discussion groups with systems biologists. Although we refer to our respondents by their discipline of training, they all self‐identify as doing systems biology. Systems biology is usually described as an attempt to make sense of the vast …
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.