Abstract
Abstract Equity-neutral impact fees should equalize the burden of paying for infrastructure facilities on all residents of a community regardless of when they move there. This article demonstrates how the method for computing impact fees determines who bears the cost burden. The article concludes the following: Impact fees, if set properly, can achieve an equity-neutral result. Equity-neutral fees are highly dependent on inflation, financing, and absorption assumptions. Economies of scale must be significant for cost savings at capacity to outweigh the carrying costs during the period in which the excess capacity is absorbed; it may be preferable to build smaller facilities with smaller excess capacity to be absorbed. An equitable approach should include regular adjustments to accommodate differences between the initial assumptions used for setting impact fees and the actual inflation and absorption rates.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.