Calculating Cornell voltage from nonstandard chest electrode recording site in the Reasons for Geographic And Racial Differences in Stroke study

Abstract

Background To minimize participants' burden and the need for disrobing, a 7-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) recording using a single mid-sternal chest lead was recorded at the initial stages of The REasons for Geographic And Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) study. Electrocardiogram-detected left ventricular hypertrophy (ECG-LVH) by Cornell voltage (RaVL + S-wave amplitude in V 3 [SV 3]) cannot be assessed from this method because of the absence of V 3. We examined the possibility that the S-wave amplitude in the mid-sternal lead (SV) could be used as a surrogate for SV 3. Methods The REGARDS study is a US national study where 7-lead ECGs were performed in 8,330 (29%) participants and standard 12-lead EGCs were performed in 20 811 (71%). Cornell voltage was calculated as the sum of aVL amplitude + SV (in the 7-lead group) or SV 3 (in the 12-lead group). Logistic regression analysis was used to examine and compare the magnitude of the association between the LVH risk factors with ECG-LVH in both groups, and Cox proportional hazards analysis was used to examine and compare the hazard ratios of overall mortality and cardiovascular mortality associated with ECG-LVH in both groups. Results Regardless of the Cornell voltage calculation method, ECG-LVH was significantly associated with LVH risk factors; and with the exception of sex, there was no evidence of a difference in the magnitude of the association. ECG-LVH from both approaches were significantly and similarly associated with both all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. Conclusion ECG-LVH by Cornell voltage calculated from a 7-lead ECG (using SV in the formula) has demographic and clinical associations that are similar to that calculated from a standard 12-lead ECG (using SV 3). In epidemiologic studies recording 7-lead ECG, SV could be used as an alternative to SV 3 in the Cornell voltage formula.