Abstract
Amlodipine was twice as potent as nifedipine at inhibiting Ca2+-induced contractions in depolarised rat aorta (IC50 1.9 nM vs. 4.1 nM) but, unlike nifedipine, displayed a very slow onset of action. Contractions induced by depolarising steps with 45 mM K+ were much less potently blocked by amlodipine (IC50 19.4 nM), whereas the potency of nifedipine was little changed (IC50 7.1 nM). This difference may be explained by a modulated receptor hypothesis, similar to that described for cardiac muscle, in which block of vascular calcium channels by dihydropyridines is enhanced at depolarized membrane potentials, such voltage-dependence only being apparent with a slow-acting drug such as amlodipine. Recovery from amlodipine block of K+-responses in rat portal vein after drug washout was also very slow. Amlodipine and nifedipine blocked phenylephrine-induced contractions of the rat aorta with potencies similar to those against depolarisation-induced responses. Negative inotropic potencies of amlodipine and nifedipine in perfused guinea pig hearts were approximately one-tenth those against Ca2+-induced contractions in rat aorta. Amlodipine caused complete block of guinea pig papillary muscle single-cell slow action potentials at a concentration (5 microM) that had no effect on upstroke velocity of normal, fast potentials but reduced the duration of the plateau phase.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.